October 2008
Monthly Archive
Monthly Archive
by: Anne Haynes
Today I was checking out my friendfeed and noticed @mattcutts feed talking about an event; Google’s Webmaster Tricks and Treats webinar
This event was a great way to ask Google questions about ranking your websites. As a search marketing specialist I watch SEO trends and consult with other specialist on tactics. What one person says works another person says it won’t work. At times the industry can be confusing. This event allowed webmasters to submit questions to the Google Search team through Google Moderator. The Google Moderator was open a few days before the event, so people could submit questions and other users could rate the questions. The questions with the highest ratings were at the top and had a better chance of being answered. When the event happened today, everyone entered a WebEx session to view presentations and chat with Googlers and other webmasters. After the presentations the Google Moderator was used to answer additional questions. John Mueller’s presentation was my favorite because it focused on shedding light on myths regarding the search engine optimization industry. Following are my notes from the presentation and my thoughts:
Duplication Content
Apparently, duplicate content is not as bad as I thought. The Google team mentioned it’s best to show your best content. However, with this statement I think it states that having 4 pages with the same content is not showing the best content. I’ve wondered why duplicate is a bad thing with Google because Google knows when a page is created based on the creation date, wouldn’t the first page created be the most authoritative? However, as link building and offsite optimization starts I can see how ranking 4 pages with different inbound link values is more complicated. The Google team suggested submitting an XML site map to support Google knowing which pages the site owner wants in the index. So, for those people that think XML site maps don’t help with your overall rankings, you’re wrong.
XML Site Maps
John Mueller stated some believe that XML site maps hurt your rankings. The opposite is true according to John. John mentioned keeping the XML site map up-to-date as being an important factor. At this time @mattcutts mentioned that submitting an XML site map won’t boost your rankings, so it was kind of confusing. Here are my thoughts on XML site maps; why wouldn’t you submit your favorite URLS to Google? Google looks at the XML site map to determine which of your sites pages to rank. There is a reason why keeping them up to date is important – Google accesses your XML site map regularly to rank your pages. And if your XML site map is out of date, then you are confusing the algorithm and making it work harder. Here is an XML site map resource for more information.
PageRank is Dead
Yes, there are SEOs that say PageRank doesn’t matter anymore. John Mueller and the Google team stated PageRank is not dead, it’s just one of the 200 other factors that help a website rank in the search engines. While many webmasters begged for information on the other 199 factors, Googlers wouldn’t play.
Site Submission
SEOs that think resubmitting a site regularly helps with rankings, Google says no. My golden rule is to submit a site when the site has changed substantially. The big question came up about Google recently updated their webmaster guidelines by removing the DMOZ Directory and Yahoo! Direcotry submission recommendations. Matt Cutts, in his own words, mentioned the removal was designed to prevent new webmasters from submitting sites to fly-by-night directories.
If you think you need to submit your website to thousands of search engines in order to rank well, this is a myth as well.
Content Refresh
The next myth John Mueller mentioned; optimize your website and don’t touch it again. For years I’ve been educating clients on the need for fresh content and I’m still doing it today. My approach for this has been to install blogs for the clients to manage and add new content on their own. And let’s face it; clients don’t want to have to pay you forever! Installing blogs has been one of my very best approaches to fresh content.
Shared Hosting
While there may have been a time when having a static IP address would benefit your rankings, Google stated sharing IP addresses is ok because IP addresses are running out. Someone needs to make some more IP address before we need a Government bailout.
I’m not going to talk about how to prevent a URL from being indexed, because a good portion of the event covered this topic, that’s for you @brianrutledge In a few days, everyone can listen to the audio and watch the presentations. If you’re needing help with navigating through all the facets of search engine optimization and making your site friendly to your users and the search engines, check out Google Webmasters Group
One thing that struck me as odd; when the event was taking place there were 200+ questions on the Google Moderator and when the event was over only 28 questions remained. Spooky…
comments off Wednesday 22 Oct 2008 | Anne Haynes | SEO
By: Anne Haynes
Woot.com has an interesting email marketing campaign. At first glance you think the email was a mistake. And then when you notice your social media username is referenced, you hope it’s a mistake. Following is the email I received today.
WOOT, INC. INTERNAL EMAIL
STAFF EYES ONLY
Attention Woot employees –
We are now entering the final phase of preparations for the Woot-Off planned for midnight tonight. This is when we depart from our usual deal-a-day model and sell one product after another, offering a new deal as soon as the previous one sells out. For some reason, Woot members like AnneHaynes continue to have high expectations for this event. We must make every effort to ensure that they feel disappointed and betrayed.
All workers should be physically and mentally straining to make this Woot-Off a success, like every muscle in a wolf’s body strains to capture and devour its prey. We expect total compliance with the following objectives:
1. Make sure the stables are thoroughly cleaned and the horses properly groomed and shod. As you know, Commander Rutledge prefers to lead us on horseback during Woot-Offs. Charge!
2. Customer Service department: all vacation requests for this week and next are approved. If you have not filed a vacation request, take one anyway.
3. The little green pills in the kitchen are there to keep you alert and working. Take as many as you need. Officially, Woot does not believe in the concept of “overdose”.
4. Take at least one of our servers offline, just for laughs.
5. Go to the landfill and dig up some more Sansa media players. If you see any Digipro Graphics Tablets (and you will), grab those, too.
6. Place crap bags in company latrines so those orders can be “filled”. To this end, the company will provide free lunch today from El Feo, the filthiest burrito joint in Dallas. Do your worst, guys.
7. Neutralize all negative thinking among our members. We simply cannot tolerate any more posts like “do not want” or “Woot-Off killer”. If electronic means like word filters and IP bans do not work, we must reactivate the rapid-response teams to physically eliminate all threats to our reputation.
8. Last time, spot checks revealed that approximately 25% of products shipped are broken, incomplete, or excessively dirty. This is unacceptable. For this Woot-Off, defective shipments must make up at least 40%.
9. Remind SmartPost that there’s no need to hurry on these orders. Prompt delivery makes our customers spoiled and argumentative. Let them learn humility and gratitude while they wait.
Above all, we must strive to make this Woot-Off even more tedious, disappointing, and lucrative than the last one. The employee who achieves the most toward this end will be rewarded with one brown Zune. Second place: two brown Zunes.
Forward into battle! Remember: to give one’s life for Woot is glorious!
Larry Stalin
eCommerce eKommissar
Woot, Inc.
THIS EMAIL WILL SELF-DESTRUCT IN 90 SECONDS
comments off Tuesday 21 Oct 2008 | Anne Haynes | Email Marketing
Today I’ve been working on optimizing one of my client’s AdWords accounts, so I decided to freshen up and conduct some research. While I love Google just like other internet marketers, I found a post on the Google AdWords Group today that made me concerned.
I’m not sure if this post is true, but if it is, there’s more discussions to come.
From: SEO-JR
Date: Oct 7, 9:58 am
Subject: AGENCY ALERT – Google Going to Clients Direct
To: AdWords Basics
I would like to understand if other Agency “Partners” of Google have had a similar experience as the one we came across with Google yesterday. It appears that while our agency is the Agency of Record for search for a Fortune 100 Real Estate company, Google has decided that they would not honor that existing relationship and would approach my client directly to sign a search contract. More concerning is that this is business that is being managed by the Google internal search team and does not take into consideration the terms we are currently running in our program. This issue was only identified when my team noticed that there were two Google ads displaying for our client with different visible URL’s. Upon digging deeper we found that not only did the Google team not consult with us on this they also bypassed the Director of Marketing at the client and went directly to the business unit to sign this $250K contract. I put this out there for agencies to read with the concern that Google will present themselves as an agency partner yet when given the opportunity to find revenue will disregard the rules of good business practice. I have a call out to my Agency Representative and will let you know how this all turns out.
Best,
JR
[email address]
comments off Tuesday 07 Oct 2008 | Anne Haynes | SEM
